採用ガイド
Technical decisions made early have a long half-life — the wrong architecture, stack, or vendor choice can cost years of refactoring. Whether you're a non-technical founder or an engineering team looking for an outside technical review, here's how to find and evaluate the right technology expert.
最初の通話やセッションでこれらを活用して、適性と専門性をすばやく評価してください。
1.Given what you know about our stack and stage, what would you be most concerned about?
重要な理由： This reveals how quickly they can pattern-match from limited information. Senior technical advisors will immediately identify 1–2 real risks.
2.How do you decide between building something custom versus using an off-the-shelf solution?
重要な理由： Build vs. buy is one of the highest-leverage decisions a technical team makes. You want someone with a principled framework, not a reflexive preference either way.
3.Tell me about a technical decision that turned out to be wrong. What happened and what would you do differently?
重要な理由： Every experienced engineer has made significant mistakes. Advisors who can talk candidly about their own failures are more trustworthy.
4.How would you approach evaluating my current codebase or architecture?
重要な理由： You want a structured thinker. A good technical reviewer will describe what they'd look for: code quality signals, test coverage, dependency risks, scalability bottlenecks.
5.What's your opinion on a specific technology choice we've made or are considering?
重要な理由： Ask something specific and technical. You want an informed opinion, not diplomatic hedging.
テクノロジーコンサルティングセッションは非常に実践的です。専門家はあなたの技術的な背景を素早く把握し、的確な診断的質問を行い、50ページのレポートではなく直接的な提言を示します。率直な意見、トレードオフ分析、そして即座に行動できる具体的なネクストステップが期待できます。